The Great Departure :: Great Departure Essays

The Great Departure   Daniel Smiths, The Great Departure illustrates very well the join States evolution from a traditionally isolationist nation to an interventionist nation. WWI literally dragged the U.S. out of its isolationist shell and placed the U.S. at the forefront of outside(a) politics. The pressure to join WWI was resisted greatly by the Wilson administration and the country as a whole. Smith does an excellent job at presenting the factors that bendd the U.S. to enter the war and at conveying the mind set of American leaders during this time and the issues they faced pertaining to the war. The author illustrates the factors of interest or the eventual causes involvement in WWI in chapters II, III, IV. He offers good points to the issues and now I would like to discuss some of the issues he has mentioned. Propaganda was a tool used by Germany and the allies to influence the U.S., whether that propaganda was used to hold the line the U.S. out of the war or to t ry and draw the U.S. into the war makes no real difference. The extent of propaganda in the U.S. is shown by the Dr. Alberts briefcase affair and the German implementation of Nurse Edith Cavell and other atrocities of war carried out by either side. The author, while recognizing the importance of these propaganda stories and the heterogeneous culture of the U.S., underestimates the actual impact on public horizon it actually had I feel. The U.S., "the great melting pot" had an enormous immigrant population, to underestimate the effect of propaganda on a population that had close personal ties to their homeland, and their ability to influence the actions of government in a democratic republic is a mistake. President Wilson was operating under this assumption that the people would influence the government when he drop to accept any of the Senator Lodges changes to the peace treaty. While I agree with Smith that this is not the reason the U.S. joined the allies in WWI, I fee l the heterogenous makeup of the U.S. population is possibly the major influence the U.S. had to move away from an isolationist state. Balance of Powers was another great factor that influenced the U.S. in its views of WWI. The U.S. and the world had come to rely on the principle of balance of power to ensure peace, security and trade throughout the world, and it was no doubt that a victory by the Central Powers would catapult Germany to superpower status and upset the balance of power in Europe and thus the rest of the world.

European Travel and the Spread of Western Ideology Essay -- European E

European Travel and the Spread of Western IdeologyHumans began their existence as travelers, slowly making their way across the earth hunting and gathering. This travel was quite slow and gradual, and could be termed a period of human expansion, as traveling groups rarely encountered other humans. It really wasnt until the sixteenth century that a new kind of travel developed, a kind that was more global, occurred rapidly, and was alter with many encounters with other civilizations. This sort of travel signified not simply the spreading of humans across the earth, but more the spreading of ideas among people. And during this particular period, the travelers were predominantly European, and so it was Europeans who, believing in their own superiority, most imposed their ideas on others. Overall, therefore, human travel could more accurately be termed European its effect was to amplify both the power and scope of European ideas. These ideas, in turn, affected many different civilizat ions, changing the thinking, and actions, of people all over the world, and therefore changing their intrusion on the world.While many civilizations have traveled at various points, it was the Europeans who, beginning in the sixteenth century, began to travel the most. It was the Europeans who went out to the peoples of Africa, Asia, and the the Statess, and never the reverse (Adas, p. 2). As soon as European ships could be built that were large enough to endure long voyages, the Europeans set out in them, realizing that this was favourous the relative advantage of Europeans was on the seas (Cippola, 138). Through this, they visited many foreign countries, and were usually the ones doing the conquering. Other people were unprepared for t... ..., Michael, Machines as the Meaure of Men Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance, Cornell Univ. Press 1989.Cipolla, Carlo M., Guns, Sails, and Empires Technological psychiatric hospital and the Early Phases of European Exp ansion, 1400-1700 Sunflower Univ. Press, 1996.Diamond, Jared, Guns, Germs, and Steel W.W. Norton & Co, 1997.Ponting, Clive. A Green History of the World, St. Martins Press, NYC, 1991.Pursell, Carroll W. Jr., Ch. 1 and 2 in Early Stationary Steam Engines in America a study in the migration of a technology Smithsonian Inst. Press, 1969, pp. 1-27.Schneider, Jane. Rumpelstilskins Bargain Folklore and the Merchant Capitalist Intensification of Linen Manufacture in Early Modern Europe. In textile and Human Experience, edited by Annette B. Weiner and Jane Schneider. Washington Smithsonian Institution Press, 1993.

The Ghosts Deception in Shakespeares Hamlet Essay -- William Shakesp

The suggestions Deception in HamletThe apparition in Hamlet cleared out the event that Hamlet was uncertain of. The spirit clarified the death of King Hamlet, and formd Hamlet to perform his evil deeds. The stalks request to avenge him caused the death of Hamlets family, friends, and eventually himself therefore, the spirit can be viewed as evil because it failed the four tests that was set by Lewes Lavater and the Church. Lewes Lavater describes how the church determines if a ghost is evil or good. The first description is good spirits terrify initially, but ultimately comfort. The spirit does not cause comfort to Hamlet. Throughout the play, the Ghost causes trouble among the characters. According to Eleanor Prosser The Ghost has done everything possible to taint Hamlets mind with lacerating grief, sexual nausea, hatred, and fury. It has just focused its appeal on the lewd picture that Hamlet knows can most corrupt him and it says, Taint not they mind(E. Prosser, pp.137) H amlet decided to kill Claudius because the Ghost wanted to avenge his death. Hamlet was obsessed to killing Claudius, which caused him his insanity. His insanity caused the death of Polonius, which lead to the death of Ophelia. The death of Ophelia led to the death of Laertes, which led to the death of the poof and king, and eventually Hamlet himself. The source of these strings of death is the Ghost. The Ghost calls Hamlet deep into this world of disruption. Its invitation to decapitate the body politic seems a horrific kicking (O cursed spite), and by the end of the play it will manifestly be so Ophelia will have been emotionally brutalized and lost to harum-scarum distraction the king and queen will have been pierced with hateful... ...all that rots, seeming to embody the very forces of corporeal ruin that Hamlet fears may be hostile virtue. Bibliography Lewes Lavater. Renaissance Theories of Ghost and Demons. http//stjohns-chs.org/english/Renaissance/Ren-gh.html Eleanor Pr osser. Spirit of Health or Goblin Damned? Hamlet and Revenge. (New York Stanford Press. 1971), pp. 137 John Hunt. A Thing of Nothing The harmful Body In Hamlet Shakespearean Quarterly Volume 39 1 (Spring 1988), pp. 35 William Shakespeare. Hamlet edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. (New York Washington satisfying Press, 1992) All future references will come from this text. Philip Edwards. The Ghost Shakespearean Criticism Volume 44, (1985), pp.126 Richard Burton with Richard L. Sterne. Interview Shakespearean Criticism Volume 21, (August 3, 1964), pp.246